Boost.Interprocess does not work only with processes but also with threads. Boost.Interprocess synchronization mechanisms can synchronize threads from different processes, but also threads from the same process.
In the traditional programming model an operating system has multiple processes running and each process has its own address space. To share information between processes we have several alternatives:
- Two processes share information using a file. To access to the data, each process uses the usual file read/write mechanisms. When updating/reading a file shared between processes, we need some sort of synchronization, to protect readers from writers.
- Two processes share information that resides in the kernel of the operating system. This is the case, for example, of traditional message queues. The synchronization is guaranteed by the operating system kernel.
- Two processes can share a memory region. This is the case of classical shared memory or memory mapped files. Once the processes set up the memory region, the processes can read/write the data like any other memory segment without calling the operating system's kernel. This also requieres some kind of manual synchronization between processes.
One of the biggest issues with interprocess communication mechanisms is the lifetime of the interprocess communication mechanism. It's important to know when an interprocess communication mechanism disappears from the system. In Boost.Interprocess, we can have 3 types of persistence:
- Process-persistence: The mechanism lasts until all the processes that have opened the mechanism close it, exit or crash.
- Kernel-persistence: The mechanism exists until the kernel of the operating system reboots or the mechanism is explicitly deleted.
- Filesystem-persistence: The mechanism exists until the mechanism is explicitly deleted.
Some native POSIX and Windows IPC mechanisms have different persistence so it's difficult to achieve portability between Windows and POSIX native mechanisms. Boost.Interprocess classes have the following persistence:
Table 9.1. Boost.Interprocess Persistence Table
|
Mechanism |
Persistence |
|---|---|
|
Shared memory |
Kernel or Filesystem |
|
Memory mapped file |
Filesystem |
|
Process-shared mutex types |
Process |
|
Process-shared semaphore |
Process |
|
Process-shared condition |
Process |
|
File lock |
Process |
|
Message queue |
Kernel or Filesystem |
|
Named mutex |
Kernel or Filesystem |
|
Named semaphore |
Kernel or Filesystem |
|
Named condition |
Kernel or Filesystem |
As you can see, Boost.Interprocess defines some mechanisms with "Kernel or Filesystem" persistence. This is because POSIX allows this possibility to native interprocess communication implementations. One could, for example, implement shared memory using memory mapped files and obtain filesystem persistence (for example, there is no proper known way to emulate kernel persistence with a user library for Windows shared memory using native shared memory, or process persistence for POSIX shared memory, so the only portable way is to define "Kernel or Filesystem" persistence).
Some interprocess mechanisms are anonymous objects created in shared memory or memory-mapped files but other interprocess mechanisms need a name or identifier so that two unrelated processes can use the same interprocess mechanism object. Examples of this are shared memory, named mutexes and named semaphores (for example, native windows CreateMutex/CreateSemaphore API family).
The name used to identify a interprocess mechanism is not portable, even between UNIX systems. For this reason, Boost.Interprocess limits this name to a C++ variable identifier or keyword:
- Starts with a letter, lowercase or uppercase, such as a letter from a to z or from A to Z. Examples: Sharedmemory, sharedmemory, sHaReDmEmOrY...
- Can include letters, underscore, or digits. Examples: shm1, shm2and3, ShM3plus4...
Named Boost.Interprocess resources (shared
memory, memory mapped files, named mutexes/conditions/semaphores) have kernel
or filesystem persistency. This means that even if all processes that have
opened those resources end, the resource will still be accesible to be opened
again and the resource can only be destructed via an explicit to their static
member remove function. This
behavior can be easily understood, since it's the same mechanism used by
functions controlling file opening/creation/erasure:
Table 9.2. Boost.Interprocess-Filesystem Analogy
|
Named Interprocess resource |
Corresponding std file |
Corresponding POSIX operation |
|---|---|---|
|
Constructor |
std::fstream constructor |
open |
|
Destructor |
std::fstream destructor |
close |
|
Member |
None. |
unlink |
Now the correspondence between POSIX and Boost.Interprocess regarding shared memory and named semaphores:
Table 9.3. Boost.Interprocess-POSIX shared memory
|
|
POSIX operation |
|---|---|
|
Constructor |
shm_open |
|
Destructor |
close |
|
Member |
shm_unlink |
Table 9.4. Boost.Interprocess-POSIX named semaphore
|
|
POSIX operation |
|---|---|
|
Constructor |
sem_open |
|
Destructor |
close |
|
Member |
sem_unlink |
The most important property is that destructors of
named resources don't remove the resource from the system, they
only liberate resources allocated by the system for use by the process for
the named resource. To remove the resource from the
system the programmer must use remove.
