Boost C++ Libraries

...one of the most highly regarded and expertly designed C++ library projects in the world. Herb Sutter and Andrei Alexandrescu, C++ Coding Standards

Click here to view the latest version of this page.

Boost.MultiIndex Future work



A number of new functionalities are considered for inclusion into future releases of Boost.MultiIndex. Some of them depend on the potential for extensibility of the library, which has been a guiding principle driving the current internal design of multi_index_container.

Contents

Ranked indices

Ordered indices are implemented using red-black trees; these trees can be augmented with additional information to obtain a type of data structure called order-statistics trees, allowing for logarithmic search of the n-th element. It has been proposed that order-statistics trees be used to devise a new type of ranked indices that support operator[] while retaining the functionality of ordered indices.

Random access indices

These indices provide random access iterators and location of elements by their position ordinal. Although they seem at first glance to model the semantics of std::vector, random access indices present important differences:

so it might be more accurate to regard this type of indices as a variation of sequenced indices with random access semantics.

Notifying indices

Notifying indices can be implemented as decorators over preexistent index types, with the added functionality that internal events of the index (insertion, erasing, modifying of elements) are signalled to an external entity --for instance, by means of the Boost.Signals library. This functionality can have applications for:

  1. Logging,
  2. interfacing to GUI-based applications,
  3. synchronization between separate data structures.

The following is a sketch of a possible realization of notifying indices:

struct insert_log
{
  void operator()(int x)
  {
    std::clog<<"insert: "<<x<<std::endl;
  }
};

int main()
{
  typedef multi_index_container<
    int,
    indexed_by<
      notifying<ordered_unique<identity<int> > >, // notifying index
      ordered_non_unique<identity<int> >
    >
  > indexed_t;

  indexed_t t;

  // on_insert is the signal associated to insertions
  t.on_insert.connect(insert_log());

  t.insert(0);
  t.insert(1);

  return 0;
}

// output:
//   insert: 0
//   insert: 1

Constraints

The notifying indices functionality described above exploits a powerful design pattern based on index adaptors, decorators over preexistent indices which add some functionality or somehow change the semantics of the underlying index. This pattern can be used for the implementation of constraints, adaptors that restrict the elements accepted by an index according to some validation predicate. The following is a possible realization of how constraints syntax may look like:

struct is_even
{
  bool operator()(int x)const{return x%2==0;}
};

typedef multi_index_container<
  int,
  indexed_by<
    constrained<ordered_unique<identity<int> >,is_even>
  >
> indexed_t;

User-defined indices

The mechanisms by which Boost.MultiIndex orchestrates the operations of the indices held by a multi_index_container are simple enough to make them worth documenting so that the (bold) user can write implementations for her own indices.

Bidirectional map

Example 4 in the examples section features a bidirectional map, implemented as a multi_index_container with two unique ordered indices. This particular structure is deemed important enough as to provide it as a separate class template, relying internally in multi_index_container. As feedback is collected from the users of Boost.MultiIndex, other singular instantiations of multi_index_container might be encapsulated to form a component library of ready to use containers.

Indexed maps

multi_index_container is rich enough to provide the basis for implementation of indexed maps, i.e. maps which can be looked upon several different keys. The motivation for having such a container is mainly aesthetic convenience, since it would not provide any additional feature to similar constructs based directly on multi_index_container.

The main challenge in writing an indexed map lies in the design of a reasonable interface that resembles that of std::map as much as possible. There seem to be fundamental difficulties in extending the syntax of a std::map to multiple keys. For one example, consider the situation:

indexed_map<int,string,double> m;
// keys are int and string, double is the mapped to value

...

cout<<m[0]<<endl;      // OK
cout<<m["zero"]<<endl; // OK
m[1]=1.0;              // !!

In the last sentence of the example, the user has no way of providing the string key mapping to the same value as m[1]. This and similar problems have to be devoted a careful study when designing the interface of a potential indexed map.

Move semantics

Andrei Alexandrescu introduced a technique for simulating move constructors called Mojo (see his article in C/C++ User Journal "Generic<Programming>: Move Constructors".) Move semantics alleviates the computational load involved in the creation and copying of temporary objects, specially for heavy classes as multi_index_containers are. David Abrahams and Gary Powell provide an alternative implementation of move semantics in their paper "Clarification of Initialization of Class Objects by rvalues" for the C++ Evolution Working Group.

Adding move semantics to multi_index_container is particularly beneficial when the container is used as an internal building block in other libraries (vg. relational database frameworks), enabling the efficient development of functions returning multi_index_containers. Without support for move semantics, this scheme is impractical and less elegant syntaxes should be resorted to.




Revised July 5th 2005

© Copyright 2003-2005 Joaquín M López Muñoz. Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. (See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)