Boost C++ Libraries

...one of the most highly regarded and expertly designed C++ library projects in the world. Herb Sutter and Andrei Alexandrescu, C++ Coding Standards

Click here to view the latest version of this page.
PrevUpHomeNext

Sharing memory between processes

Shared memory
Memory Mapped Files
More About Mapped Regions
Limitations When Constructing Objects In Mapped Regions

Shared memory is the fastest interprocess communication mechanism. The operating system maps a memory segment in the address space of several processes, so that several processes can read and write in that memory segment without calling operating system functions. However, we need some kind of synchronization between processes that read and write shared memory.

Consider what happens when a server process wants to send a html file to a client process that resides in the same machine using network mechanisms:

  • The server must read the file to memory and pass it to the network functions, that copy that memory to the OS's internal memory.
  • The client uses the network functions to copy the data from the OS's internal memory to its own memory.

As we can see, there are two copies, one from memory to the network and another one from the network to memory. And those copies are made using operating system calls that normally are expensive. Shared memory avoids this overhead, but we need to synchronize both processes:

  • The server maps a shared memory in its address space and also gets access to a synchronization mechanism. The server obtains exclusive access to the memory using the synchronization mechanism and copies the file to memory.
  • The client maps the shared memory in its address space. Waits until the server releases the exclusive access and uses the data.

Using shared memory, we can avoid two data copies, but we have to synchronize the access to the shared memory segment.

To use shared memory, we have to perform 2 basic steps:

  • Request to the operating system a memory segment that can be shared between processes. The user can create/destroy/open this memory using a shared memory object: An object that represents memory that can be mapped concurrently into the address space of more than one process..
  • Associate a part of that memory or the whole memory with the address space of the calling process. The operating system looks for a big enough memory address range in the calling process' address space and marks that address range as an special range. Changes in that address range are automatically seen by other process that also have mapped the same shared memory object.

Once the two steps have been successfully completed, the process can start writing to and reading from the address space to send to and receive data from other processes. Now, let's see how can we do this using Boost.Interprocess:

To manage shared memory, you just need to include the following header:

#include <boost/interprocess/shared_memory_object.hpp>

As we've mentioned we have to use the shared_memory_object class to create, open and destroy shared memory segments that can be mapped by several processes. We can specify the access mode of that shared memory object (read only or read-write), just as if it was a file:

  • Create a shared memory segment. Throws if already created:

using boost::interprocess;
shared_memory_object shm_obj
   (create_only                  //only create
   ,"shared_memory"              //name
   ,read_write                   //read-write mode
   );
  • To open or create a shared memory segment:

using boost::interprocess;
shared_memory_object shm_obj
   (open_or_create               //open or create
   ,"shared_memory"              //name
   ,read_only                    //read-only mode
   );
  • To only open a shared memory segment. Throws if does not exist:

using boost::interprocess;
shared_memory_object shm_obj
   (open_only                    //only open
   ,"shared_memory"              //name
   ,read_write                   //read-write mode
   );

When a shared memory object is created, its size is 0. To set the size of the shared memory, the user must use the truncate function call, in a shared memory that has been opened with read-write attributes:

shm_obj.truncate(10000);

As shared memory has kernel or filesystem persistence, the user must explicitly destroy it. The remove operation might fail returning false if the shared memory does not exist, the file is open or the file is still memory mapped by other processes:

using boost::interprocess;
shared_memory_object::remove("shared_memory");

For more details regarding shared_memory_object see the boost::interprocess::shared_memory_object class reference.

Once created or opened, a process just has to map the shared memory object in the process' address space. The user can map the whole shared memory or just part of it. The mapping process is done using the the mapped_region class. The class represents a memory region that has been mapped from a shared memory or from other devices that have also mapping capabilities (for example, files). A mapped_region can be created from any memory_mappable object and as you might imagine, shared_memory_object is a memory_mappable object:

using boost::interprocess;
std::size_t ShmSize = ...

//Map the second half of the memory
mapped_region region
   ( shm                      //Memory-mappable object
   , read_write               //Access mode
   , ShmSize/2                //Offset from the beginning of shm
   , ShmSize-ShmSize/2        //Length of the region
   );

//Get the address of the region
region.get_address();

//Get the size of the region
region.get_size();

The user can specify the offset from the mappable object where the mapped region should start and the size of the mapped region. If no offset or size is specified, the whole mappable object (in this case, shared memory) is mapped. If the offset is specified, but not the size, the mapped region covers from the offset until the end of the mappable object.

For more details regarding mapped_region see the boost::interprocess::mapped_region class reference.

Let's see a simple example of shared memory use. A server process creates a shared memory object, maps it and initializes all the bytes to a value. After that, a client process opens the shared memory, maps it, and checks that the data is correctly initialized. This is the server process:

#include <boost/interprocess/shared_memory_object.hpp>
#include <boost/interprocess/mapped_region.hpp>
#include <iostream>
#include <cstring>

int main ()
{
   using namespace boost::interprocess;
   try{
      //Erase previous shared memory
      shared_memory_object::remove("shared_memory");

      //Create a shared memory object.
      shared_memory_object shm (create_only, "shared_memory", read_write);

      //Set size
      shm.truncate(1000);

      //Map the whole shared memory in this process
      mapped_region region(shm, read_write);

      //Write all the memory to 1
      std::memset(region.get_address(), 1, region.get_size());
   }
   catch(interprocess_exception &ex){
      shared_memory_object::remove("shared_memory");
      std::cout << ex.what() << std::endl;
      return 1;
   }
   return 0;
}

Now the client process:

#include <boost/interprocess/shared_memory_object.hpp>
#include <boost/interprocess/mapped_region.hpp>
#include <iostream>
#include <cstring>

int main ()
{
   using namespace boost::interprocess;
   try{
      //Open already created shared memory object.
      shared_memory_object shm (open_only, "shared_memory", read_only);

      //Map the whole shared memory in this process
      mapped_region region(shm, read_only);

      //Check that memory was initialized to 1
      const char *mem = static_cast<char*>(region.get_address());
      for(std::size_t i = 0; i < region.get_size(); ++i){
         if(*mem++ != 1){
            std::cout << "Error checking memory!" << std::endl;               
            return 1;
         }
      }
      std::cout << "Test successful!" << std::endl;
   }
   catch(interprocess_exception &ex){
      std::cout << "Unexpected exception: " << ex.what() << std::endl;
      shared_memory_object::remove("shared_memory");
      return 1;
   }
   shared_memory_object::remove("shared_memory");
   return 0;
}

Boost.Interprocess provides portable shared memory in terms of POSIX semantics. Some operating systems don't support shared memory as defined by POSIX:

  • Windows operating systems provide shared memory using memory backed by the paging file but the lifetime semantics are different from the ones defined by POSIX (see Native windows shared memory section for more information).
  • Some UNIX systems don't support shared memory objects at all. MacOS is one of these operating systems.

In those platforms, shared memory is emulated with mapped files created in the temporary files directory. Because of this emulation, shared memory has filesystem lifetime in those systems.

shared_memory_object provides an static remove function to remove a shared memory objects.

This function can fail if the shared memory objects does not exist or it's opened by another process. Note that this function is similar to the standard C int remove(const char *path) function. In UNIX systems, shared_memory_object::remove calls shm_unlink:

  • The function will remove the name of the shared memory object named by the string pointed to by name.
  • If one or more references to the shared memory object exist when is unlinked, the name will be removed before the function returns, but the removal of the memory object contents will be postponed until all open and map references to the shared memory object have been removed.
  • Even if the object continues to exist after the last function call, reuse of the name will subsequently cause the creation of a boost::interprocess::shared_memory_object instance to behave as if no shared memory object of this name exists (that is, trying to open an object with that name will fail and an object of the same name can be created again).

In Windows operating systems, the function fails if the object is being used, so a programmer can't consider the UNIX behavior as the portable behavior:

shared_memory_object::remove can fail if the shared memory is still in use, but this does not mean that it will fail if it's in use. Just the same behavior as the standard C (stdio.h) int remove(const char *path) function.

Creating a shared memory segment and mapping it can be a bit tedious when several processes are involved. When processes are related via fork() operating system call in UNIX sytems a simpler method is available using anonymous shared memory.

This feature has been implemented in UNIX systems mapping the device \dev\zero or just using the MAP_ANONYMOUS in a POSIX conformant mmap system call.

This feature is wrapped in Boost.Interprocess using the anonymous_shared_memory() function, which returns a mapped_region object holding an anonymous shared memory segment that can be shared by related processes.

Here's is an example:

#include <boost/interprocess/anonymous_shared_memory.hpp>
#include <boost/interprocess/mapped_region.hpp>
#include <iostream>
#include <cstring>

int main ()
{
   using namespace boost::interprocess;
   try{
      //Create an anonymous shared memory segment with size 1000
      mapped_region region(anonymous_shared_memory(1000));

      //Write all the memory to 1
      std::memset(region.get_address(), 1, region.get_size());
     
      //The segment is unmapped when "region" goes out of scope
   }
   catch(interprocess_exception &ex){
      std::cout << ex.what() << std::endl;
      return 1;
   }
   return 0;
}

Once the segment is created, a fork() call can be used so that region is used to communicate two related processes.

Windows operating system also offers shared memory, but the lifetime of this shared memory is very different to kernel or filesystem lifetime. The shared memory is created backed by the pagefile and it's automatically destroyed when the last process attached to the shared memory is destroyed.

Because of this reason, there is no effective way to simulate kernel or filesystem persistence using native windows shared memory and Boost.Interprocess emulates shared memory using memory mapped files. This assures portability between POSIX and Windows operating systems.

However, accessing native windows shared memory is a common request of Boost.Interprocess users because they want to access to shared memory created with other process that don't use Boost.Interprocess. In order to manage the native windows shared memory Boost.Interprocess offers the windows_shared_memory class.

Windows shared memory creation is a bit different from portable shared memory creation: the size of the segment must be specified when creating the object and can't be specified through truncate like with the shared memory object.

Take in care that when the last process attached to a shared memory is destroyed the shared memory is destroyed so there is no persistency with native windows shared memory. Native windows shared memory has also another limitation: a process can open and map the whole shared memory created by another process but it can't know which is the size of that memory. This limitation is imposed by the Windows API so the user must somehow trasmit the size of the segment to processes opening the segment.

Let's repeat the same example presented for the portable shared memory object: A server process creates a shared memory object, maps it and initializes all the bytes to a value. After that, a client process opens the shared memory, maps it, and checks that the data is correctly initialized. Take in care that if the server exits before the client connects to the shared memory the client connection will fail, because the shared memory segment is destroyed when no processes are attached to the memory.

This is the server process:

#include <boost/interprocess/windows_shared_memory.hpp>
#include <boost/interprocess/mapped_region.hpp>
#include <iostream>
#include <cstring>

int main ()
{
   using namespace boost::interprocess;
   try{
      //Create a native windows shared memory object.
      windows_shared_memory shm (create_only, "shared_memory", read_write, 1000);

      //Map the whole shared memory in this process
      mapped_region region(shm, read_write);

      //Write all the memory to 1
      std::memset(region.get_address(), 1, 1000);

      //Launch the client process and wait until finishes...
      //...
   }
   catch(interprocess_exception &ex){
      std::cout << ex.what() << std::endl;
      return 1;
   }
   return 0;
}

Now, before destroying the windows_shared memory object, launch the client process:

#include <boost/interprocess/windows_shared_memory.hpp>
#include <boost/interprocess/mapped_region.hpp>
#include <iostream>
#include <cstring>

int main ()
{
   using namespace boost::interprocess;
   try{
      //Open already created shared memory object.
      windows_shared_memory shm(open_only, "shared_memory", read_only);

      //Map the whole shared memory in this process
      mapped_region region (shm, read_only);

      //Check that memory was initialized to 1
      const char *mem = static_cast<char*>(region.get_address());
      for(std::size_t i = 0; i < 1000; ++i){
         if(*mem++ != 1){
            std::cout << "Error checking memory!" << std::endl;               
            return 1;
         }
      }

      std::cout << "Test successful!" << std::endl;
   }
   catch(interprocess_exception &ex){
      std::cout << "Unexpected exception: " << ex.what() << std::endl;
      return 1;
   }

   return 0;
}

As we can see, native windows shared memory needs synchronization to make sure that the shared memory won't be destroyed before the client is launched.

File mapping is the association of a file's contents with a portion of the address space of a process. The system creates a file mapping to associate the file and the address space of the process. A mapped region is the portion of address space that the process uses to access the file's contents. A single file mapping can have several mapped regions, so that the user can associate parts of the file with the address space of the process without mapping the entire file in the address space, since the file can be bigger than the whole address space of the process (a 9GB DVD image file in a usual 32 bit systems). Processes read from and write to the file using pointers, just like with dynamic memory. File mapping has the following advantages:

  • Uniform resource use. Files and memory can be treated using the same functions.
  • Automatic file data synchronization and cache from the OS.
  • Reuse of C++ utilities (STL containers, algorithms) in files.
  • Shared memory between two or more applications.
  • Allows efficient work with a large files, without mapping the whole file into memory
  • If several processes use the same file mapping to create mapped regions of a file, each process' views contain identical copies of the file on disk.

File mapping is not only used for interprocess communication, it can be used also to simplify file usage, so the user does not need to use file-management functions to write the file. The user just writes data to the process memory, and the operating systems dumps the data to the file.

When two processes map the same file in memory, the memory that one process writes is seen by another process, so memory mapped files can be used as an interprocess communication mechanism. We can say that memory-mapped files offer the same interprocess communication services as shared memory with the addition of filesystem persistence. However, as the operating system has to synchronize the file contents with the memory contents, memory-mapped files are not as fast as shared memory.

To use memory-mapped files, we have to perform 2 basic steps:

  • Create a mappable object that represent an already created file of the filesystem. This object will be used to create multiple mapped regions of the the file.
  • Associate the whole file or parts of the file with the address space of the calling process. The operating system looks for a big enough memory address range in the calling process' address space and marks that address range as an special range. Changes in that address range are automatically seen by other process that also have mapped the same file and those changes are also transferred to the disk automatically.

Once the two steps have been successfully completed, the process can start writing to and reading from the address space to send to and receive data from other processes and synchronize the file's contents with the changes made to the mapped region. Now, let's see how can we do this using Boost.Interprocess:

To manage mapped files, you just need to include the following header:

#include <boost/interprocess/file_mapping.hpp>

First, we have to link a file's contents with the process' address space. To do this, we have to create a mappable object that represents that file. This is achieved in Boost.Interprocess creating a file_mapping object:

using boost::interprocess;
file_mapping m_file
   ("/usr/home/file"       //filename
   ,read_write             //read-write mode
   );

Now we can use the newly created object to create mapped regions. For more details regarding this class see the boost::interprocess::file_mapping class reference.

After creating a file mapping, a process just has to map the shared memory in the process' address space. The user can map the whole shared memory or just part of it. The mapping process is done using the the mapped_region class. as we have said before The class represents a memory region that has been mapped from a shared memory or from other devices that have also mapping capabilities:

using boost::interprocess;
std::size_t FileSize = ...

//Map the second half of the file
mapped_region region
   ( m_file                   //Memory-mappable object
   , read_write               //Access mode
   , FileSize/2               //Offset from the beginning of shm
   , FileSize-FileSize/2      //Length of the region
   );

//Get the address of the region
region.get_address();

//Get the size of the region
region.get_size();

The user can specify the offset from the file where the mapped region should start and the size of the mapped region. If no offset or size is specified, the whole file is mapped. If the offset is specified, but not the size, the mapped region covers from the offset until the end of the file.

If several processes map the same file, and a process modifies a memory range from a mapped region that is also mapped by other process, the changes are inmedially visible to other processes. However, the file contents on disk are not updated immediately, since that would hurt performance (writting to disk is several times slower than writing to memory). If the user wants to make sure that file's contents have been updated, it can flush a range from the view to disk. When the function returns, the data should have been written to disk:

//Flush the whole region
region.flush();

//Flush from an offset until the end of the region
region.flush(offset);

//Flush a memory range starting on an offset
region.flush(offset, size);

Remember that the offset is not an offset on the file, but an offset in the mapped region. If a region covers the second half of a file and flushes the whole region, only the half of the file is guaranteed to have been flushed.

For more details regarding mapped_region see the boost::interprocess::mapped_region class reference.

Let's reproduce the same example described in the shared memory section, using memory mapped files. A server process creates a shared memory segment, maps it and initializes all the bytes the a value. After that, a client process opens the shared memory, maps it, and checks that the data is correctly initialized. This is the server process:

#include <boost/interprocess/file_mapping.hpp>
#include <boost/interprocess/mapped_region.hpp>
#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>
#include <cstring>
#include <cstddef>
#include <cstdio>    //std::remove

int main ()
{
   using namespace boost::interprocess;
   try{
      //Create a file
      std::filebuf fbuf;
      fbuf.open("file.bin", std::ios_base::in | std::ios_base::out 
                           | std::ios_base::trunc | std::ios_base::binary); 

      //Set the size
      fbuf.pubseekoff(9999, std::ios_base::beg);
      fbuf.sputc(0);
      fbuf.close();

      //Create a file mapping.
      file_mapping m_file("file.bin", read_write);

      //Map the whole file in this process
      mapped_region region
         (m_file                    //What to map
         ,read_write //Map it as read-write
         );

      if(region.get_size() != 10000)
         return 1;

      //Get the address of the mapped region
      void * addr       = region.get_address();
      std::size_t size  = region.get_size();

      //Write all the memory to 1
      std::memset(addr, 1, size);

   }
   catch(interprocess_exception &ex){
      std::remove("file.bin");
      std::cout << ex.what() << std::endl;
      return 1;
   }
   return 0;
}

Now the client process:

#include <boost/interprocess/file_mapping.hpp>
#include <boost/interprocess/mapped_region.hpp>
#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>
#include <cstddef>
#include <cstdio>    //std::remove
#include <vector>

int main ()
{
   using namespace boost::interprocess;
   try{
      //Open the file mapping
      file_mapping m_file ("file.bin", read_only);

      //Map the whole file in this process
      mapped_region region
         (m_file                    //What to map
         ,read_only  //Map it as read-only
         );

      //Get the address of the mapped region
      void * addr       = region.get_address();
      std::size_t size  = region.get_size();

      //Check that memory was initialized to 1
      const char *mem = static_cast<char*>(addr);
      for(std::size_t i = 0; i < size; ++i){
         if(*mem++ != 1){
            std::cout << "Error checking memory!" << std::endl;
            return 1;
         }
      }

      //Now test it reading the file
      std::filebuf fbuf;
      fbuf.open("file.bin", std::ios_base::in | std::ios_base::binary); 

      //Read it to memory
      std::vector<char> vect(region.get_size(), 0);
      fbuf.sgetn(&vect[0], std::streamsize(vect.size()));

      //Check that memory was initialized to 1
      mem = static_cast<char*>(&vect[0]);
      for(std::size_t i = 0; i < size; ++i){
         if(*mem++ != 1){
            std::cout << "Error checking memory!" << std::endl;
            return 1;
         }
      }

      std::cout << "Test successful!" << std::endl;
   }
   catch(interprocess_exception &ex){
      std::remove("file.bin");
      std::cout << "Unexpected exception: " << ex.what() << std::endl;
      return 1;
   }
   std::remove("file.bin");
   return 0;
}

As we have seen, both shared_memory_object and file_mapping objects can be used to create mapped_region objects. A mapped region created from a shared memory object or a file mapping are the same class and this has many advantages.

One can, for example, mix in STL containers mapped regions from shared memory and memory mapped files. The libraries that only depend on mapped regions can be used to work with shared memory or memory mapped files without recompiling them.

In the example we have seen, the file or shared memory contents are mapped to the address space of the process, but the address was chosen by the operating system.

If several processes map the same file/shared memory, the mapping address will be surely different in each process. Since each process might have used its address space in a different way (allocation of more or less dynamic memory, for example), there is no guarantee that the file/shared memory is going to be mapped in the same address.

If two processes map the same object in different addresses, this invalids the use of pointers in that memory, since the pointer (which is an absolute address) would only make sense for the process that wrote it. The solution for this is to use offsets (distance) between objects instead of pointers: If two objects are placed in the same shared memory segment by one process, the address of each object will be different in another process but the distance between them (in bytes) will be the same.

So the first advice when mapping shared memory and memory mapped files is to avoid using raw pointers, unless you know what you are doing. Use offsets between data or relative pointers to obtain pointer functionality when an object placed in a mapped region wants to point to an object placed in the same mapped region. Boost.Interprocess offers a smart pointer called boost::interprocess::offset_ptr that can be safely placed in shared memory and that can be used to point to another object placed in the same shared memory / memory mapped file.

The use of relative pointers is less efficient than using raw pointers, so if a user can succeed mapping the same file or shared memory object in the same address in two processes, using raw pointers can be a good idea.

To map an object in a fixed address, the user can specify that address in the mapped region's constructor:

mapped_region region ( shm                         //Map shared memory
                     , read_write                  //Map it as read-write
                     , 0                           //Map from offset 0
                     , 0                           //Map until the end
                     , (void*)0x3F000000           //Map it exactly there
                     );

However, the user can't map the region in any address, even if the address is not being used. The offset parameter that marks the start of the mapping region is also limited. These limitations are explained in the next section.

As mentioned, the user can't map the memory mappable object at any address and it can specify the offset of the mappable object that is equivalent to the start of the mapping region to an arbitrary value. Most operating systems limit the mapping address and the offset of the mappable object to a multiple of a value called page size. This is due to the fact that the operating system performs mapping operations over whole pages.

If fixed mapping address is used, offset and address parameters should be multiples of that value. This value is, tipically, 4KB or 8KB for 32 bit operating systems.

//These might fail because the offset is not a multiple of the page size
//and we are using fixed address mapping
mapped_region region1( shm                   //Map shared memory
                     , read_write            //Map it as read-write
                     , 1                     //Map from offset 1
                     , 1                     //Map 1 byte
                     , (void*)0x3F000000     //Aligned mapping address
                     );

//These might fail because the address is not a multiple of the page size
mapped_region region2( shm                   //Map shared memory
                     , read_write            //Map it as read-write
                     , 0                     //Map from offset 0
                     , 1                     //Map 1 byte
                     , (void*)0x3F000001     //Not aligned mapping address
                     );

Since the operating system performs mapping operations over whole pages, specifying a mapping size or offset that are not multiple of the page size will waste more resources than necessary. If the user specifies the following 1 byte mapping:

//Map one byte of the shared memory object.
//A whole memory page will be used for this.
mapped_region region ( shm                    //Map shared memory
                     , read_write             //Map it as read-write
                     , 0                      //Map from offset 0
                     , 1                      //Map 1 byte
                     );

The operating system will reserve a whole page that will not be reused by any other mapping so we are going to waste (page size - 1) bytes. If we want to use effiently operating system resources, we should create regions whose size is a multiple of page size bytes. If the user specifies the following two mapped regions for a file with which has 2*page_size bytes:

//Map the first quarter of the file
//This will use a whole page
mapped_region region1( shm                //Map shared memory
                     , read_write         //Map it as read-write
                     , 0                  //Map from offset 0
                     , page_size/2        //Map page_size/2 bytes
                     );

//Map the rest of the file
//This will use a 2 pages
mapped_region region2( shm                //Map shared memory
                     , read_write         //Map it as read-write
                     , page_size/2        //Map from offset 0
                     , 3*page_size/2      //Map the rest of the shared memory
                     );

In this example, a half of the page is wasted in the first mapping and another half is wasted in the second because the offset is not a multiple of the page size. The mapping with the minimum resource usage would be to map whole pages:

//Map the whole first half: uses 1 page
mapped_region region1( shm                //Map shared memory
                     , read_write         //Map it as read-write
                     , 0                  //Map from offset 0
                     , page_size          //Map a full page_size
                     );

//Map the second half: uses 1 page
mapped_region region2( shm                //Map shared memory
                     , read_write         //Map it as read-write
                     , page_size          //Map from offset 0
                     , page_size          //Map the rest
                     );

How can we obtain the page size? The mapped_region class has an static function that returns that value:

//Obtain the page size of the system
std::size_t page_size = mapped_region::get_page_size();

The operating system might also limit the number of mapped memory regions per process or per system.

When two processes create a mapped region of the same mappable object, two processes can communicate writing and reading that memory. A process could construct a C++ object in that memory so that the second process can use it. However, a mapped region shared by multiple processes, can't hold any C++ object, because not every class is ready to be a process-shared object, specially, if the mapped region is mapped in different address in each process.

When placing objects in a mapped region and mapping that region in different address in every process, raw pointers are a problem since they are only valid for the process that placed them there. To solve this, Boost.Interprocess offers an special smart pointer that can be used instead of a raw pointer. So user classes containing raw pointers (or Boost smart pointers, that internally own a raw pointer) can't be safely placed in a process shared mapped region. These pointers must be replaced with offset pointers, and these pointers must point only to objects placed in the same mapped region if you want to use these shared objects from different processes.

Of course, a pointer placed in a mapped region shared between processes should only point to an object of that mapped region. Otherwise, the pointer would point to an address that it's only valid one process and other processes may crash when accesing to that address.

References suffer from the same problem as pointers (mainly because they are implemented as pointers). However, it is not possible to create a fully workable smart reference currently in C++ (for example, operator .() can't be overloaded). Because of this, if the user wants to put an object in shared memory, the object can't have any (smart or not) reference as a member.

References will only work if the mapped region is mapped in the same base address in all processes sharing a memory segment. Like pointers, a reference placed in a mapped region should only point to an object of that mapped region.

The virtual table pointer and the virtual table are in the address space of the process that constructs the object, so if we place a class with a virtual function or virtual base class, the virtual pointer placed in shared memory will be invalid for other processes and they will crash.

This problem is very difficult to solve, since each process needs a different virtual table pointer and the object that contains that pointer is shared accross many processes. Even if we map the mapped region in the same address in every process, the virtual table can be in a different address in every process. To enable virtual functions for objects shared between processes, deep compiler changes are needed and virtual functions would suffer a performance hit. That's why Boost.Interprocess does not have any plan to support virtual function and virtual inheritance in mapped regions shared between processes.

Static members of classes are global objects shared by all instances of the class. Because of this, static members are implemented as global variables in processes.

When constructing a class with static members, each process has its own copy of the static member, so updating a static member in one process does not change the value of the static member the another process. So be careful with these classes. Static members are not dangerous if they are just constant variables initialized when the process starts, but they don't change at all (for example, when used like enums) and their value is the same for all processes.


PrevUpHomeNext