boost/bimap/detail/concept_tags.hpp
// Boost.Bimap
//
// Copyright (c) 2006-2007 Matias Capeletto
//
// Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0.
// (See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at
// http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
/// \file detail/concept_tags.hpp
/// \brief Bimap tags and concepts
#ifndef BOOST_BIMAP_DETAIL_CONCEPT_TAGS_HPP
#define BOOST_BIMAP_DETAIL_CONCEPT_TAGS_HPP
#if defined(_MSC_VER) && (_MSC_VER>=1200)
#pragma once
#endif
#include <boost/config.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/identity.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/placeholders.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/bool.hpp>
namespace boost {
namespace bimaps {
namespace detail {
/// \brief Tag of {SetType}_of definition classes
/**
The {SetType}_of classes are derived from this class so it is easy to construct
metafunctions. For example now is easy to create a is_set_type_of metafunction.
**/
struct set_type_of_tag {};
/// \brief Tag of {SetType}_of_relation defition classes
struct set_type_of_relation_tag {};
/// \brief Tag of {Side}_based identifiers
struct side_based_tag : set_type_of_relation_tag {};
} // namespace detail
/** \struct boost::bimaps::left_based
\brief Tag to indicate that the main view will be based on the left side.
This is convenient because the multi-index core will be more efficient.
If possible use this options or the right based one.
See also right_based.
**/
/** \struct boost::bimaps::right_based
\brief Tag to indicate that the main view will be based on the right side.
This is convenient because the multi-index core will be more efficient.
If possible use this options or the right based one.
See also left_based.
**/
#ifndef BOOST_BIMAP_DOXYGEN_WILL_NOT_PROCESS_THE_FOLLOWING_LINES
struct left_based : ::boost::bimaps::detail::side_based_tag
{
// I run into troubles if I do not define bind for side based tags.
// Maybe a more coherent way of binding the relation can be developped.
template< class Relation > struct bind_to { typedef void type; };
typedef mpl::bool_<true> left_mutable_key;
typedef mpl::bool_<true> right_mutable_key;
};
struct right_based : ::boost::bimaps::detail::side_based_tag
{
// I run into troubles if I do not define bind for side based tags.
// Maybe a more coherent way of binding the relation can be developped.
template< class Relation > struct bind_to { typedef void type; };
typedef mpl::bool_<true> left_mutable_key;
typedef mpl::bool_<true> right_mutable_key;
};
#endif // BOOST_BIMAP_DOXYGEN_WILL_NOT_PROCESS_THE_FOLLOWING_LINES
typedef mpl::_ _relation;
} // namespace bimaps
} // namespace boost
#endif // BOOST_BIMAP_DETAIL_CONCEPT_TAGS_HPP