...one of the most highly
regarded and expertly designed C++ library projects in the
world.
— Herb Sutter and Andrei
Alexandrescu, C++
Coding Standards
These traits are all value traits inheriting from
integral_constant
and providing a simple true
or false
boolean value
which reflects the fact that given
types can or cannot be used with given operators.
For example, has_plus<int, double>::value
is a bool
which value is
true
because it is possible
to add a double
to an int
like in the following code:
int i; double d; i+d;
It is also possible to know if the result of the operator can be used as
function argument of a given type. For example, has_plus<int, double, float>::value
is true
because it is possible
to add a double
to an int
and the result (double
)
can be converted to a float
argument like in the following code:
void f(float) { }; int i; double d; f(i+d);
These traits can be useful to optimize the code for types supporting given
operations. For example a function std::advance
that increases an iterator of a given number of steps could be implemented
as follows:
#include <boost/type_traits/has_plus_assign.hpp> namespace detail { template < class Iterator, class Distance, bool has_plus_assign > struct advance_impl; // this is used if += exists (efficient) template < class Iterator, class Distance > struct advance_impl<Iterator, Distance, true> { void operator()(Iterator &i, Distance n) { i+=n; } }; // this is use if += does not exists (less efficient but cannot do better) template < class Iterator, class Distance > struct advance_impl<Iterator, Distance, false> { void operator()(Iterator &i, Distance n) { if (n>0) { while (n--) ++i; } else { while (n++) --i; } } }; } // namespace detail template < class Iterator, class Distance > inline void advance(Iterator &i, Distance n) { detail::advance_impl< Iterator, Distance, ::boost::has_plus_assign<Iterator>::value >()(i, n); }
Then the compiler chooses the most efficient implementation according to
the type's ability to perform +=
operation:
#include <iostream> class with { int m_i; public: with(int i=0) : m_i(i) { } with &operator+=(int rhs) { m_i+=rhs; return *this; } operator int const () { return m_i; } }; class without { int m_i; public: without(int i=0) : m_i(i) { } without &operator++() { ++m_i; return *this; } without &operator--() { --m_i; return *this; } operator int const () { return m_i; } }; int main() { with i=0; advance(i, 10); // uses += std::cout<<"with: "<<i<<'\n'; without j=0; advance(j, 10); // uses ++ std::cout<<"without: "<<j<<'\n'; return 0; }
The syntax is the following:
template< class Rhs, class Ret=dont_care >
has_op; // prefix operator template< class Lhs, class Ret=dont_care >
has_op; // postfix operator template< class Lhs, class Rhs=Lhs, class Ret=dont_care >
has_op; // binary operator
where:
Lhs
is the type used
at the left hand side of operator
op
,
Rhs
is the type used
at the right hand side of operator
op
,
Ret
is the type for
which we want to know if the result of operator
op
can be converted to.
The default behaviour (Ret=dont_care
)
is to not check for the return value of the operator. If Ret
is different from the default dont_care
, the return value is checked
to be convertible to Ret
.
Convertible to Ret
means
that the return value can be used as argument to a function expecting
Ret
:
void f(Ret); Lhs lhs; Rhs rhs; f(lhs+rhs); // is valid if has_plus<Lhs, Rhs, Ret>::value==true
If Ret=void
, the return type is checked to be exactly
void
.
The following tables give the list of supported binary, prefix and postfix operators.
Table 1.4. Supported prefix operators
prefix operator |
trait name |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1.5. Supported postfix operators
postfix operator |
trait name |
---|---|
|
|
|
Table 1.6. Supported binary operators
binary operator |
trait name |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following operators are not supported because they could not be implemented
using the same technique: operator=
, operator->
, operator&
, operator[]
, operator,
, operator()
, operator
new
.
A reference sign &
in
the operator argument is ignored so that has_plus< int&, double& >::value==has_plus<
int, double >::value
. This has been chosen because if
the following code works (does not work):
int i; double d; i+d;
the following code also works (does not work):
int &ir=i; double &dr=d; ir+dr;
It was not possible to handle properly the volatile
qualifier so that any construct using this qualifier has undefined behavior.
As a help, the following tables give the necessary conditions over each
trait template argument for the trait value
to be true
. They are non sufficient
conditions because the conditions must be true
for all arguments and return type for value
to be true
.
Table 1.7. necessary and non sufficient condition on operator argument for value to be true
operator declaration |
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|
|
false |
true |
true |
|
false |
true |
true |
|
false |
true |
false |
|
false |
true |
true |
Table 1.8. necessary and non sufficient condition on operator return type for value to be true
operator declaration |
|
|
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
true |
false |
false |
false |
false |
|
false |
true |
true |
false |
true |
|
false |
true |
true |
false |
true |
|
false |
true |
true |
true |
true |
|
false |
true |
true |
false |
true |
The implementation consists in only header files. The following headers should included first:
#include <boost/type_traits/has_operator.hpp>
or
#include <boost/type_traits/has_op.hpp>
where op
is the textual name chosen for the wanted operator.
The first method includes all operator traits.
All traits are implemented the same way using preprocessor macros to avoid
code duplication. The main files are in boost/type_traits/detail
:
has_binary_operator.hpp
, has_prefix_operator.hpp
and has_postfix_operator.hpp
. The example of prefix
operator-
is presented below:
namespace boost { namespace detail { // This namespace ensures that argument-dependent name lookup does not mess things up. namespace has_unary_minus_impl { // 1. a function to have an instance of type T without requiring T to be default // constructible template <typename T> T &make(); // 2. we provide our operator definition for types that do not have one already // a type returned from operator- when no such operator is // found in the type's own namespace (our own operator is used) so that we have // a means to know that our operator was used struct no_operator { }; // this class allows implicit conversions and makes the following operator // definition less-preferred than any other such operators that might be found // via argument-dependent name lookup struct any { template <class T> any(T const&); }; // when operator- is not available, this one is used no_operator operator-(const any&); // 3. checks if the operator returns void or not // conditions: Rhs!=void // we first redefine "operator," so that we have no compilation error if // operator- returns void and we can use the return type of // (-rhs, returns_void_t()) to deduce if operator- returns void or not: // - operator- returns void -> (-rhs, returns_void_t()) returns returns_void_t // - operator- returns !=void -> (-rhs, returns_void_t()) returns int struct returns_void_t { }; template <typename T> int operator,(const T&, returns_void_t); template <typename T> int operator,(const volatile T&, returns_void_t); // this intermediate trait has member value of type bool: // - value==true -> operator- returns void // - value==false -> operator- does not return void template < typename Rhs > struct operator_returns_void { // overloads of function returns_void make the difference // yes_type and no_type have different size by construction static ::boost::type_traits::yes_type returns_void(returns_void_t); static ::boost::type_traits::no_type returns_void(int); static const bool value = sizeof(::boost::type_traits::yes_type)==sizeof(returns_void((-make<Rhs>(),returns_void_t()))); }; // 4. checks if the return type is Ret or Ret==dont_care // conditions: Rhs!=void struct dont_care { }; template < typename Rhs, typename Ret, bool Returns_void > struct operator_returns_Ret; template < typename Rhs > struct operator_returns_Ret < Rhs, dont_care, true > { static const bool value = true; }; template < typename Rhs > struct operator_returns_Ret < Rhs, dont_care, false > { static const bool value = true; }; template < typename Rhs > struct operator_returns_Ret < Rhs, void, true > { static const bool value = true; }; template < typename Rhs > struct operator_returns_Ret < Rhs, void, false > { static const bool value = false; }; template < typename Rhs, typename Ret > struct operator_returns_Ret < Rhs, Ret, true > { static const bool value = false; }; // otherwise checks if it is convertible to Ret using the sizeof trick // based on overload resolution // condition: Ret!=void and Ret!=dont_care and the operator does not return void template < typename Rhs, typename Ret > struct operator_returns_Ret < Rhs, Ret, false > { static ::boost::type_traits::yes_type is_convertible_to_Ret(Ret); // this version is preferred for types convertible to Ret static ::boost::type_traits::no_type is_convertible_to_Ret(...); // this version is used otherwise static const bool value = sizeof(is_convertible_to_Ret(-make<Rhs>()))==sizeof(::boost::type_traits::yes_type); }; // 5. checks for operator existence // condition: Rhs!=void // checks if our definition of operator- is used or an other // existing one; // this is done with redefinition of "operator," that returns no_operator or has_operator struct has_operator { }; no_operator operator,(no_operator, has_operator); template < typename Rhs > struct operator_exists { static ::boost::type_traits::yes_type check(has_operator); // this version is preferred when operator exists static ::boost::type_traits::no_type check(no_operator); // this version is used otherwise static const bool value = sizeof(check(((-make<Rhs>()),make<has_operator>())))==sizeof(::boost::type_traits::yes_type); }; // 6. main trait: to avoid any compilation error, this class behaves // differently when operator-(Rhs) is forbidden by the standard. // Forbidden_if is a bool that is: // - true when the operator-(Rhs) is forbidden by the standard // (would yield compilation error if used) // - false otherwise template < typename Rhs, typename Ret, bool Forbidden_if > struct trait_impl1; template < typename Rhs, typename Ret > struct trait_impl1 < Rhs, Ret, true > { static const bool value = false; }; template < typename Rhs, typename Ret > struct trait_impl1 < Rhs, Ret, false > { static const bool value = ::boost::type_traits::ice_and< operator_exists < Rhs >::value, operator_returns_Ret < Rhs, Ret, operator_returns_void < Rhs >::value >::value >::value ; }; // specialization needs to be declared for the special void case template < typename Ret > struct trait_impl1 < void, Ret, false > { static const bool value = false; }; // defines some typedef for convenience template < typename Rhs, typename Ret > struct trait_impl { typedef typename ::boost::remove_reference<Rhs>::type Rhs_noref; typedef typename ::boost::remove_cv<Rhs_noref>::type Rhs_nocv; typedef typename ::boost::remove_cv< typename ::boost::remove_reference< typename ::boost::remove_pointer<Rhs_noref>::type >::type >::type Rhs_noptr; static const bool value = trait_impl1 < Rhs_noref, Ret, ::boost::is_pointer< Rhs_noref >::value >::value; }; } // namespace impl } // namespace detail // this is the accessible definition of the trait to end user template < typename Rhs, typename Ret=::boost::detail::has_unary_minus_impl::dont_care > struct has_unary_minus : ::boost::integral_constant<bool,(::boost::detail::has_unary_minus_impl::trait_impl < Rhs, Ret >::value)> { }; } // namespace boost
T
then the instantiation of the corresponding
trait will produce a compiler error. For this reason these traits cannot
be used to determine whether a type has a public operator or not.
struct A { private: A operator-(); }; boost::has_unary_minus<A>::value; // error: A::operator-() is private
A
and B
is convertible to A
.
In this case, the compiler will report an ambiguous overload because
both the existing operator and the one we provide (with argument of
type any
) need type
conversion, so that none is preferred.
struct A { }; void operator-(const A&); struct B { operator A(); }; boost::has_unary_minus<A>::value; // this is fine boost::has_unary_minus<B>::value; // error: ambiguous overload between // operator-(const any&) and // operator-(const A&) // both need type conversion
struct B { }; struct A { A(const B&) { } }; void operator-(const A&); boost::has_unary_minus<A>::value; // this is fine boost::has_unary_minus<B>::value; // error: ambiguous overload between // operator-(const any&) and // operator-(const A&) // both need type conversion
true
instead of false
. This
applies in particular to the containers of the standard library and
operator==
.
Example:
#include <boost/type_traits/has_equal_to.hpp> #include <iostream> template <class T> struct contains { T data; }; template <class T> bool operator==(const contains<T> &lhs, const contains<T> &rhs) { return f(lhs.data, rhs.data); } class bad { }; class good { }; bool f(const good&, const good&) { } int main() { std::cout<<std::boolalpha; // works fine for contains<good> std::cout<<boost::has_equal_to< contains< good > >::value<<'\n'; // true contains<good> g; g==g; // ok // does not work for contains<bad> std::cout<<boost::has_equal_to< contains< bad > >::value<<'\n'; // true, should be false contains<bad> b; b==b; // compile time error return 0; }
volatile
qualifier is
not properly handled and would lead to undefined behavior
Frederic Bron is very thankful to numerous people from the boost mailing list for their kind help and patience. In particular, the following persons have been very helpful for the implementation: Edward Diener, Eric Niebler, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung (Jr.), Robert Stewart, Roman Perepelitsa, Steven Watanabe, Vicente Botet.